Actress Sona and three questions asked by her to SingerSaran.நடிகை சோனாவின் மூன்று கேள்விகள்?

Actress Sona and three questions asked by her to SingerSaran.நடிகை சோனாவின் மூன்று கேள்விகள்?

Junior Vikatan in its issue dated 2-10-2011 stated, that Sona wants the apology from Singer Saran in the presence of journalists and he must reply for her three questions. The first question: Is it not true that Saran has tried to touch the places, where he should not touch on her? Second Question: Is it not true that Saran has placed his hand on her theigh? Third Question: Is it not true, that Saran has asked Sona, what is your rate? Sona has stated that Saran must accept the reality of his behaviour and must take apology. We do not know, what Saran has replied for Sonas questions.


But Actress Sona on 28-9-2011 Wednesday submitted a petition to the police stating that she was willing to withdraw complaints against singer S P Charan, who allegedly misbehaved with her at a party on September 15. Sona said she decided to withdraw the complaint after Charan gave her a written apology. Sona said a mutual friend had sorted out things between the two. In the evening 28-9-2011, she met T Nagar assistant commissioner of police S Tamil Selvan to submit a petition seeking to withdraw her complaint.


But the police said Sona has to approach the court to withdraw her complaint. “We have already sent the copies of her complaint to a magistrate court. Sona and Charan will have to go to the court to resolve the issue,” Selvan said.


The people are not worried about the withdrawal of the case, but they want to know, what is the actual reply of Singer Saran for the three important questions asked by Actress Sona.

Actress Sona says SPB Charan pressed me without restraint.[சரண் என்னைக்கண்டபடி அமுக்கினான்.]

Actress Sona says SPB Charan pressed me without restraint.[சரண் என்னைக்கண்டபடி அமுக்கினான்.]


Tamil film actress Sona, who had lodged a complaint a week ago accusing singer and producer SPB Charan of misbehaving with her at a party, met Greater Chennai police commissioner J K Tripathy and submitted a VCD allegedly containing evidence to support her claim.


However, the actress refused to give details about the CD. “I just came to submit the VCD and also request the police commissioner to pursue the case and order speedy action,” she told TOI.


Sona said she couldn’t meet the police commissioner on Thursday and so returned to urge him to expedite investigation into the matter and also submit what she claimed was “evidence” to back her charges against the singer.


Based on the actress’ complaint last week, the Soundarapandianar Angadi police had registered a case under various IPC Sections, including molesting charges, against the singer. When she demanded that he apologise for his indecent act, Charan allegedly denied and threatened her with dire consequences, Sona had then said.


In her complaint, she said that at a party hosted to celebrate the success of Ajith’s 50th film ‘Mankaatha’, Charan, son of veteran playback singer SP Balasubramaniam, molested her under the influence of alcohol.


The party was held at actor Vaibhav’s house where director Venkat Prabhu, actor Premji Amaran and a few others participated, the complaint added. “I have exposed the issue to the media and the police only to ensure that he (Charan) does not repeat such acts again, not only with me but also with any other woman,” Sona said. “I am in the industry for my livelihood. But I do have my dignity. Charan should apologise for his act,” Sona had demanded.


It is our request to safeguard self respect that any actress should not attend public functions in sexy dresses to attract others attention particularly youngsters.

Amaraneedi Nayanar. அமர்நீதி நாயனார்.

Amaraneedi Nayanar. அமர்நீதி நாயனார்.

Amaraneedi Nayanar belonged to Pazhaiyaarai in the Chola Kingdom. Pazhaiyaarai was a very fertile place, surrounded on all sides by gardens and green fields. Amaraneedi Nayanar was a trader in gold, diamonds, silks and cotton goods. He earned money honestly and became rich. Though he was engaged in worldly activities, his mind was fixed on Lord Siva. He was an ardent Siva Bhakta. He would invite Siva Bhaktas to his house and worship them. He would give the Kowpeenam, cloth, etc., and feed them nicely and send them away happy, with other gifts.


Lord Siva was highly pleased with Amaraneedi Nayanar’s Kowpeena charity and extreme kindness to Siva Bhaktas. He wanted to show to the world His Bhakta’s greatness and also shower His blessings on him. So, one day Lord Siva in the guise of a Brahmachari, with beautiful matted locks on his head, sacred ashes on his forehead, with a staff on his shoulder, appeared before Amaraneediar’s Mutt. Two Kowpeenams and a small ash-bag were tied to one end of the staff. He had a charming face. His eyes were glittering. He walked gracefully into the Mutt. Amaraneediar, with extreme joy, welcomed him and worshipped him. The Brahmachari said: ‘Oh friend, you are a noble soul. People are highly praising your Kowpeena charity. I have come to you for Darshan.’ Amaraneediar begged of him to take Bhiksha. He readily agreed and said: ‘I shall go to the river and return after finishing my bath and Nitya Karmas. Rain may drench my Kowpeenams. So, please keep this dry Kowpeenam safely with you, and I shall come back for it. The Kowpeenam is very precious, as you already know. So, please keep it safe.’


The Brahmachari went away, and Amaraneediar kept the Kowpeenam safely inside the house. But, the Lord willed that it should disappear! Soon after the Brahmachari came back after his bath, etc., and asked for the dry Kowpeenam as rain had drenched the Kowpeenam he had on the staff. Amaraneediar could not find it. He prayed hard to the Lord. Yet, he could not find it. He approached the Brahmachari, trembling, with another Kowpeenam, and explained his predicament to him. But, the Brahmachari was in no mood to take any explanation. Amaraneediar offered much wealth, etc., in compensation. But, the Brahmachari said: ‘What have I to do with all this wealth? All these are of no use to me. I only need a Kowpeenam.’ And, in saying so, the Lord in the guise of the Brahmachari, uttered a very great truth. He continued: ‘I have got another Kowpeenam: you can give me another of the same weight.’ Amaraneediar was greatly relieved when he heard this. He brought a balance. He put the Kowpeenam on one side and another piece on the other. The Brahmachari’s scale went down. Whatever Amaraneediar put on his side, the Brahmachari’s scale was heavier. Amaraneediar was amazed: and he understood that it was God’s own Lila


Amaraneediar got on the scale with his wife and his child, saying: ‘If I have truly served the Siva Bhaktas, with faith and sincerity, let this sca1e be equal in weight to the other one.’ Immediately the two scales were equal. The merit of Amaraneediar’s selfless service of the Siva Bhaktas was equal to the merit of Lord Siva’s Kowpeenam. The people who witnessed this were wonderstruck. They prostrated before Amaraneediar and praised him. The Brahmachari disappeared and Lord Parameswara and Mother Parvathi appeared on Their Rishabha before Amaraneediar, his wife and child. He blessed them. OM Nama Sivaaya…!

Vaiko praised Jayalalitha that she has earned historical fame in helping to stay the execution of three convicts in Rajiv case.

Vaiko praised Jayalalitha that she has earned historical fame in helping to stay the execution of three convicts in Rajiv case.

The Madras high court on Tuesday [30-8-2011] granted an eight-week stay on the execution of the three convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.


A specially constituted bench of Justices C Nagappan and M Sathyanarayanan admitted the petitions filed by the trio, V Sriharan alias Murugan, T Suthendraraja alias Santhan and AG Perarivalan alias Arivu, asking for their sentences to be commuted. The Union ministry of home affairs and the state government, which are the main respondents, have been directed to file their replies.


The main contention of the three convicts is the prolonged delay in the disposal of their mercy pleas and the “mental trauma” they have undergone. “Since the matter involves consideration of a question of law, the writ petitions are admitted and there shall be interim injunction. Counter by eight weeks,” the order said.


Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, who represented Murugan, began making his arguments and concluded in exactly half an hour. He started off by summarizing the facts of the case.


Quoting various Supreme Court and high court judgments that the delay was a ground for commutation of sentence, Jethmalani said, “Unless the delay is properly explained or justified, it makes the death penalty immoral, illegal and, according to me, unconstitutional.”


Senior counsel R Vaigai and human rights lawyer Csolin Gonsalves appeared for Santhan and Perarivalan respectively. Even as the arguments continued inside, news trickled to the crowd waiting outside the court hall that the Tamil Nadu assembly had passed a unanimous resolution that the death sentence should be commuted. While lawyers were still discussing this development, the order of stay was passed.


“The main contention raised in all the writ petitions is the delay of 11 years and four months in the disposal of the mercy petitions submitted by the petitioners, seeking commutation of the death sentence imposed on them,” the order said.

Vaiko MDMK leader praised Tamilnadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha saying, that she has earned a Historixcal fame by passing a resolution urging President Pratibha Patil to reconsider the clemency pleas of the three persons sentenced to death in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa moved the resolution and it was passed just half an hour before the Madras high court stayed their execution.