Whether People worshipping GOD are Barbarians?!

Whether People worshipping GOD are Barbarians ?!

There is no GOD and those who are worshipping GOD are barbarians. This theory was preached by Sri. E.V.Ramasamy Naicker [PERIYAR] founder of Dravidar Kazhagam. Once at early age of 25 he became a saint and went to Banaras and other Holy places in India. He was also the president of Tamil Nadu Congress during the year 1924. He joined Gandhiji’s non- cooperation movement. He also stopped the innocent poor people from going to toddy shops. But he is not having any faith on God's.

Periyar was the best friend of Sri. C.Rajagopalachariar [RAJAJI] former Governor General of India. He had supported and worked for several Brahmin’s, who stood in the General Elections during the year 1952. His statue preaching the No God theory being to be installed near the Srirangam Temple in Tamil Nadu was damaged by Hindu Makkal Katchi protesting that it should not be installed in front of the temple. Agitating to this a group of persons ransacked a mutt of the Sri Kamakoti Charities at Maravaneri and other temples at West Mambalam, Chennai and other places and also attacked some Brahmin community people's in Tamil Nadu

Like this during the year 1095, the Turks subjected the Christians Patriarch of Jerusalem to great humiliation. Even now the Pakistan reserved to itself the right of organizing propaganda and main plank of the propaganda being the cry of Jihad or war against India. Pakistan activists targeting Hindu places and temples and daily killing innocent peoples.

During Independence struggle, we have also lost thousands of our brothers due to racial hatred.Several Brahmins in Tamil Nadu Sacrificed their life during the struggle for Independence of India and they have also worked for the uplift of Tamil language,music, Drama, Dance, Politics and to improve Peoples welfare.Hindu Temples are not belonging to any individual person's and they should not be attacked. The hatred should not repeat now. We want the mankind and brotherhood. The Government of Tamil Nadu in India must also take strict action in not allowing any leader’s statue to be installed in front of any worship places and any Individual's should not be attacked for any reason's. No God theory can be preached by some other peaceful way and not by racial hatred or harassment.

Whether People worshipping GOD are Barbarians ?!

Periyar and Karunanidhi

Islamic Nuclear Programme.

Islamic Nuclear Programme.

During 1979 Iraq launched a nuclear weapons programme of its own. Although Iraq has signed the Non-proliferation Treaty, the Iraqis were reported to have bought a swimming pool reactor from France which would have enabled them to produce weapons-grade plutonium. However on 12th April 1979 the equipment for that reactor while stored in a ware house in a southern French port awaiting shipment was mysteriously blown up presumably by Israeli Agents.

Like Iraq Pakistan attempt to get a nuclear reprocessing plant from France for chemical separation of plutonium from spent fuel has been temporarily halted and it has come to light that Pakistan had also been buying components for a uranium enrichment facility. It may be also looking for clandestine means to acquire fissile material by sale or theft, so that it could be readily fabricated by Pakistan scientists in some kind of a crude explosive device.

Pakistan’s Islamic Bomb will have the following repercussions:-

1. Israel would be deterred from carrying out a full scale invasion and occupation of Arab countries.
2. A Nuclear reprisal by Israel to concerted Arab offensive would also be deterred.
3. Oil rich Arab states armed with nuclear weapons would be able to withstand American and other external threats and pressures.
4. The possibility of sub-national organizations like the Palestine Liberation Organization [P.L.O.] getting access to Islamic nuclear devices might create enormous uncertainty in the minds of Israelis which of course, would be advantage to the overall Arab cause.
5. A Pakistan nuclear weapons would not only deter India from considering a conventional attack on Pakistan, but it might even deter India from taking any retaliatory conventional action against Pakistan’s offensive moves, for instance in “Kashmir”.
6. Nuclearisation of Islam would strengthen the Islamic solidarity of Muslim populations all over the world, whether they are in Soviet, Central Asia, and Sin kiang, in the Indian sub-continent or elsewhere.

Pakistan has for long been considered a potential nuclear weapon power, and policy wise, it has kept out of not only the Non-proliferation Treaty, but also the partial test ban Treaty. As was to be expected, Pakistan always created an image of having linked its nuclear policy with that of India. It was easy for Pakistan leadership to convince the western world that for them keeping the option open was a justifiable reaction to India’s nuclear policy. For the United States and its allies this Pakistan reaction became a convenient leverage to apply pressure on India. The advocates of the Non-proliferation Treaty felt that if India were restrained both India and Pakistan would remain non-nuclear military powers.

[Islamic Nuclear programme will continue]

Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme.

Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme.

Pakistan-Arab countries ambition was to build a nuclear bomb for Islam. A number of intelligence agencies had known about this for years, but first time that the Indian public heard about this development was taken when former foreign Minister Vajpayee quietly revealed in the Lok Sabha in March 1979 that India has verified through independent sources of its own that the Pakistan nuclear programme had acquired “non-peaceful” dimensions.

The Arabs had adequate money. On the conventions front there was no problem in acquiring sophisticated weapons from the west, since the west was only too eager to recycle some of the mounting reserves of petro-dollars by selling back arms.

Two developments turned this dream into a foreseeable reality. One was the emergence of Zulifikar Ali Bhutto, the Pakistan leader, as a champion of the Islamic cause. It could not have been difficult for the flamboyant Bhutto to convince the leaders of the Arab world, particularly Saudi Arabia and Libya, that it was possible to develop an Islamic nuclear option. Secondly the Pakistan civilian nuclear programme had by then reached such a level of sophistication that it was possible for Pakistan scientists, with the facilities available to them, to embark on a weapons programme, if only it could be supported financially by the oil rich Arab countries.

There is no direct evidence of either Saudi Arabia or Libya or any other Arab country having actively collaborated with Pakistan on the nuclear project, in any case they posses neither the man power nor the industrial infrastructure to participate directly in a nuclear weapons programme.

However, Saudi Arabia and Libya have been the major financial supporters of Pakistan in this venture. Both countries have a common though nor necessarily a shared interest in nuclearising the Arab world.

The other major development which nurtured the idea of an Islamic bomb was the global proliferation of nuclear technology, materials and components. Most of the components for the fabrication of fissile material are now available in the open market, thanks to the loopholes in the Non Proliferation Treaty in which the sponsors, the nuclear weapon powers exempted themselves from all nuclear safeguards. Pakistan thro its nuclear scientists abroad and its convert industrial connections, and the Arab through their oil and money connections have considerable leverage in the European nuclear markets to get access to the required materials.


[Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme will continue]

Partition of Pakistan and Hindustan.

Partition of Pakistan and Hindustan.


Due to partition of Two countries, there are hardly any minorities left in West Pakistan, and already five million inhabitants, including Buddhists and Christians have been forced out of East Pakistan. Discrimination is excersied against minorities in employment, business and rent remittances as a matter of policy, and their immovable properties are requisitioned or acquired by force. They are also subjected to a systematic and discriminatory denial in passport and visa facilities.

No member of a minority can hold the highest office in Pakistan under its present constitution. No Hindu has held any portfolio in the Central Government during the past years, much less responsible appointments in the Police or defence services. No Hindu has held the office of a Chief Justice or a Judge or similar other positions. . Yet there are some eight to Ten million Hindus in Pakistan.

The two nation theory is applied in practice with a vengeance. In other words minorities are suspect. The vicious theory is also being applied to reduce the population of East Pakistan to silence its leaders claim for a special position in Pakistan based on its larger population.

A minority journal “Amar Desh” of East Pakistan in its issue of 3rd September 1964 commented with despair:

If 80 percent people of any country tell the remaining 20 percent that they are a separate nation and they have no ideological or philosophical affinity with them, what is left for the minority but to accept it and organize itself seperayely ? After living together for several years, to-day it is being discovered a new that Hindus and Muslims are separate and under no circumstances can they be identified each other. After the establishment of Pakistan , the minority of community had demanded to be known simply as Pakistan citizens and had wanted only citizenship, constitutional rights and National integration. It has supported joint elections even at its own cost. But today it has become clear that it is impossible to build up a unified nation in Pakistan.

This would suggest that only a Muslim can be a National of Pakistan. Some of them are pushed into Assam, and also to Burma and when evicted by the Government concerned are dubbed as Indian Nationals. The Indian census figures show that they there was overall increase in the percentage of Muslims population in India. Not only could there be no question of Muslims leaving India. Muslims from Pakistan had infact been infiltrating into the surrounding Indian States of West Bengal, Assam and Tirpura in large numbers.


[Hindu desam will continue]

Nehru-Liaquat Agreement.

Nehru-Liaquat Agreement.

THE Nehru-Liaquat agreement on 8th April 1950 made an important provision about minorities in Pakistan and Hindustan. Article ‘A’ of the Agreement stated as under:-

The Government of India and Pakistan solemnly agree that each shall ensure to the minorities throughout its territory complete equality of citizenship, irrespective of religion, a full sense of security in respect of live, culture, property and personal honour, freedom of movement within each country and freedom of occupation, speech and worship, subject to law and morality. Members of the minority shall have equal opportunity with members of majority community to participate in the public life of the country. Both Governments declare there rights to be fundamental and undertake to enforce them effectively.

The prime Minister of India has drawn attention to the effect that these rights are guaranteed to all minorities in India by its constitution. The Prime Minister of Pakistan has pointed out that similar provision exists in the Objectives Resolution adopted by
The constituent Assembly of Pakistan.

No one can pretend that in India there are no regrettable communal incidents since the Agreement was signed. What can be claimed is that, in spite of poisonous propaganda by the Muslim League prior to the partition and by Pakistan after it. The Government of India and the state governments have tried their best to adhere to the principle and purposes of secular democracy. The policy has been acclaimed by many independent
Authorities including several Islamic states.

In Pakistan on the other hand, the treatment of minorities leaves them as only second-class citizens, serving as targets for periodic, officially stimulated mass attacks on their life, honour and property. Thousands of communal incidents have taken place in the two wings of Pakistan on most of which Government of India and the state Governments concerned have had to lodge protests with Pakistan authorities though in vain.

The squeeze is put on helpless minorities to force them to flee to India and in the process to seize their property, to molest their women and subject them to forced conversion.
There are hardly any minorities left in West Pakistan, and, already, nearly five million inhabitants, including Buddhists and Christians have been forced out of East Pakistan. Discrimination is exercised against minorities in employment, business and rent remittances and their immovable properties are requisitioned or acquired by force. They are also subjected to a systematic and discriminatory denial of Pass Port and Visa facilities.



[Hindu Desam will continue]

Hindustan and Pakistan Differences.[Part-II]

Hindustan and Pakistan Differences.
{Part-II}

India accepted an agreement in January 1949, which provided for private sale and exchange of urban immovable property between Hindustan and Pakistan. No sooner was agreement signed; Pakistan leaders and News papers opened a barrage of propaganda to undermine it. The government of Pakistan followed up with an ordinance making it obligatory for any visitor to Pakistan to obtain an income-tax clearance certificate before leaving Pakistan unless his period of stay was less than 15 days at a time and less than 60 days in a year.

In the above circumstances that no displaced person could hope to sell or exchange his urban immovable property at a fair price. The government of Pakistan while supporting the proposal for private sale and exchange of property, in fact rendered it impossible for anyone to arrange sale or exchange without inviting insolvency.

In April 1956, Pakistan proposed a spot verification of claims by a Pakistan team for immovable property of the value of Rs.50 lakhs and above submitted by Muslim evacuees from India. Two years later it was agreed at a conference that claims for urban immovable property of the value of Rs. 5 lakhs and above should be verified by joint teams of Hindustan and Pakistan. The proposal, which Pakistan had made on its own initiative, was however not implemented by its government.

As regards agricultural lands, the principal of government –to-government has been accepted by a joint committee of the two countries. A problem of enormous magnitude and complexity involving hundreds of thousands of houses, shops, factories, workshops and institutions of all kinds, besides million of acres of agricultural land, could be solved only at government level.

The value of urban evacuee property in India does not exceed 20 percent of the value of the corresponding property left in Pakistan. India suggested that properties up to a certain valuation might be exchanged on government-to-government level, properties above that valuation being left open for private sale and exchange.

In 1953, India expressed its willingness to consider the Pakistan suggestion of private sale and exchange, provided the government of Pakistan was prepared to offer a reasonable solution for the properties which would remain undisposed of by private sale and exchange. To Hindustan’s regret, Pakistan refused even to discuss this and other implications of the proposal for private sale and exchange.

[Pakistan and Hindustan Differences will continue.]

Hindustan and Pakistan Differences.

Hindustan and Pakistan Differences.

At the time of partition, as regards Kashmir, the attitude of Pakistan betrayed a series of contradictions. The ruler’s right to accede to India or Pakistan subject to the geographical compulsions and wishes of the people was upheld by Jinnah in a number of statements. But in the Kashmir case he dismissed the right of the plea that the ruler was a Hindu. The majority of the people being Muslim, they were assumed to have an objective other than that of losing their identity in Pakistan.

For several years the ruler of Kashmir Sheik Abdullah was described as a “quisling”. It is equally fashionable in Pakistan to enforce the martial law at home, to suppress liberty, to deny basic rights to its inhabitants and to control over Press.

The leaders of Pakistan make professions of peace and train professional “liberators” the wars upon Kashmir and other parts of India. When Pakistan claims to Kashmir on the grounds of religion prove of little avail they shift the basis of their territorial demands to the requirements of Pakistan’s communication, economy and defence

Another problem which has bedeviled relations between the two countries is evacuee property. During partition millions of people migrated from West Pakistan to India and from North India to West Pakistan, not to mention many more who were forced to India from East Pakistan. The migrants from West Pakistan were mostly land owners, entrepreneurs in business and industry, and members of various professions like Law, Medicine and Teaching. Those who left India for Pakistan belonged mainly to the poorer classes, being tillers of the soil, artisans, labourers and petty shop keepers..

The value of evacuee urban property left by Hindus and Sikhs in West Pakistan amounts to over several billion dollars against less than Rs.100 Crores worth of property left behind by Muslim migrants to Pakistan.


[Hindu Desam will continue]

Hindu Desam

Hindu Desam




JaiHind! Vande Matharam!!

The fundamental unity of Hindustan was achieved by religious, cultural and economic interests. All sectarian or racial difference was merged in the national sentiment. Therefore the natural divisions of Hindustan have not destroyed the fundamental unity of the country. Unity amidst diversity has been a unique feature of the Hindustan culture. “Hindu Desam” as an Institution that will benefit mankind not only in India but also in rest of the world.

Hindustan and Pakistan.

Before Independence, Jinnah replied to a foreign correspondent “The last thing in attaining freedom for Pakistan, I seek is bloodshed. Although if driven to it, no Muslim is afraid to defend himself. “After some years Sir Sikander Hayat Khan, the Chief Minister of the Punjab had expressed his fear that if Pakistan if created would mean a massacre. His fear proved to be only true and a lot of massacre engulfed Muslims, Hindus and others.

Apparently the dream of Homeland for Muslims had little faith in their political liberty. As the First Governor-General of Pakistan, Jinnah assumed powers under the 9th schedule rather than part II of the 1935 Act, “Which gave him at once dictatorial powers unknown to any constitutional Governor-General representing the King.” The only freedom which politicians enjoyed in the Jinnah’s Pakistan was the freedom to malign India, and to nurse and propagate the illusion of an India determined to destroy Pakistan. The same propaganda is now continued in Pakistan.

In Pakistan which rose out of sea of blood, all absolute power was concentrated in the hands of one individual. Such was the structure of Jinnah’s thought and actions which laid the foundation of Pakistan and inevitably, furnished the Blue print for Pakistan policy towards India and its relations with other countries. At the root of his thinking lay the assumption that there was nothing in common between Hindus and Muslims. If such a view were accepted, the gulf between India and Pakistan could never be bridged.

Another problem which arose between Hindustan and Pakistan concerned the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Going against his own pronouncements that accession was a matter for the ruler to decide. Jinnah claimed Jammu and Kashmir on the basis of religion. Jinnah was in a hurry and he began to put political and economic pressure on the state to bend its people to his own will. When this failed he organized a tribal invasion of state in the course of which the people of the state were subjected to wholesale loot, arson and slaughter. Threatened with another failure Pakistan put its regular forces in Kashmir. When faced with the complete failure of its forces by the advancing Indian Army. Pakistan accepted the cease fire.

Pakistan then agreed to the wishes of the people being ascertained by a plebiscite on the condition of prior vacation of its aggression and proceeded to obstruct, in every possible way, the implementation of U.N.Commission’s resolutions on the subject. In order to achieve its objective of seizing Kashmir by force of arms, Pakistan joined Western military blocs and signed a military aid agreement with the U.S.A.

When this proved to be an illusion, Pakistan made common cause with the Peoples Republic of China. Thus having secured over the billion dollars worth of Tanks, jet fighters and sophisticated weapons from the U.S.A. and other western allies, and having received assurance of Chinese support, Pakistan tried massive armed infiltration into Kashmir in August 1965, followed by a full fledged invasion with armour and air force.




Hindu Desam will continue.