Indian Vedic Period class of Division belonging to the Group of Aryas only

Indian Vedic Period class of Division belonging to the Group of Aryas only

In early Vedic period of India several family groups are mentioned in Rig-Veda to indicate separate units. They are called as Bharatas, Matsyas, Krivis, Tritsus, Yadus, Purus, Anus and etc.

Rajan was the name for the ruling chief, primarily a leader of war. He was elected by the people. Valour and military leadership was important considerations in electing him. Several verses in Rig-Veda and Athervanaveda describe the keen contest of rival candidates in the elections of Kings. Gradually, Kingship became hereditary. The Royal treasury was filled with gifts from the people, tributes of defeated tribes and the boot of war.


In Vedic period Rajan was not an absolute monarch but a sort of dignified magistrate with only executive duties. Two assemblies, Sabha and Samiti were responsible for the government of the nation. Sabha was an assembly of the distinguished great men of various activities and Samiti was the popular assembly of all Aryas, belonging to the region. Sabhasad, the member of the Sabha was greatly respected. Gramani, the representative of the Grama [Village] was also included in the Assembly.


All the members participated in the councils held by the King to discuss the matters of government and the Rajan was to act according to the decision of the members. Purohita was the learned Vedic Pandits who guided the King and the people in all matters of religious, social customs, morality, law etc. Senani was the leader of the Army.


Some of the tribes in remote villages managed their own affairs without a King. It is explained in Vedic verses that Chiefs or Rajas met together and decided matters in the tribal assembly. The word of Raja was applied to all important persons participating in the deliberations of such assemblies.


The King was in no sense divine but was duly respected. Living in a grand palace, the King conducted his court with dignity. Administration of justice was also are his important duties. But usually the disputes were settled in the village through the arbitrator, Madh-yamsi. Crimes of theft, robbery, murder, etc, were condemned and punished with heavy fines called vairadeya and shatadaya. Failure to repay debts often resulted in slavery.

The Aryas had already a class division. In hymn Purushasukta in Rig-Veda that the four classes, Brahmana, Rajanya, vaishya, and shudra. But all are belonging to the Group of Aryas only. The classes were not distinct nor were they rigid. You can also download Purushasukta from the Side Bar.

U.S. Military aid to Pakistan was not intended to be used against India

U.S. Military aid to Pakistan was not intended to be used against India

The country against which the U.S. military aid and alliances were directed, at least so far as official declaration in Pakistan are concerned was India. When asked if a military with the U.S. would not make a settlement of the Kashmir problem more difficult, Mohammed Ali Bogra, then Prime Minister of Pakistan said “Yes at first. But again I am convinced that ultimately it would make a settlement easier. At present we cannot get a settlement mainly because India has greater military strength and Nehru is not much interested in a settlement.

Chaudhry Mohammed Ali, another Prime Minister of Pakistan, has said that the “hope of receiving the Kashmir tangle to Pakistan’s satisfaction through the acquisition of military strength by joining Baghdad and SEATO pacts is the very raison d’etre for Pakistan to remain a member of these pacts. Subrawardy another Prime Minister of Pakistan was no less unequivocal. Pakistan, he said, would “continue to seek alliances, military and otherwise, as long as there is remote danger from India to the country’s safety and territorial integrity.” Defending the Baghdad Pact, he remarked: “Even if there is a five percent of chance of attack from India, I must be strong enough to see that that chance should be zero chance.”

Obviously, Pakistan objective was to dictate terms of a settlement on Kashmir to India from a position of strength. Speaking in the foreign affairs debate in the Pakistan National Assembly on 26th March 1956, the Foreign Minister of Pakistan said: The most notable achievement of the SEATO is the joint reaffirmation by the members of our stand on Kashmir Another Foreign Minister said at a public meeting in Lahore on 20th October 1956 that “ a powerful neighbouring country which was inimical to Pakistan had in fact forced us to seek friendship elsewhere.”
“That country,” he went on, “has great differences with this country and the two pacts have enable Pakistan to ensure its defence against aggression.” The next day he confirmed that the country he had in mind was India. On another occasion he said: “Pakistan will not agree to commit suicide by getting out of the Baghdad pact which is our defence against India. Time was to show that Western Military aid to Pakistan resulted only in encouraging Pakistan to commit further aggression on India.

These statement were made and more were to be made in subsequent years, in defiance of public assurance given to India by the President of the United States and its secretary of State that U.S. Military aid to Pakistan was not intended to be used against India and that should it be so used the U.S. would come to the aid of India against Pakistan.

The senate foreign relations Sub-committee had to warn Pakistan in 1961 that military assistance “has never been given to Pakistan for defence against possible attack from India.” These assurances were repeated in subsequent years, only to be ignored when the occasion for their fulfillment arose in 1965.

Pakistan joined western military alliances only to get gain over India.

Pakistan joined western military alliances only to get gain over India.

During 1958, Chinese diplomats complained about Pakistan Prime Minister Subrawardy’s anti communist policy. Subsequently China’s official organ, such as the People’s Daily and the Peking Review, criticized Pakistan policies, particularly the existence of American missile and naval bases in Pakistan under the cover of SEATO and CENTO. In 1959, China protested to Pakistan for having shown courtesies to a mission of Muslims from Taiwan which had arrived in Karachi en route to Mecca for the Haj. The Peking Review as a Pakistan writer says, used strong language to castigate Pakistan for receiving the Haj mission and for denouncing the Chinese action in Tibet. The Chinese Government also lodged a further protest in July 1959 with the Pakistan Embassy in Peking.

China did not like President Ayub Khan’s suggestion to India for the joint defence of the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent and asked Pakistan to indicate against whom this joint defence was intended to be organized. Manzur Qadir, the Foreign Minister repeatedly expressed in April 1059 his misgivings and fear about communist expansionism and urged other Asian countries to join collective security arrangements.

Thus China too regarded Pakistan’s military alliances with western countries as directed its security. There was; however a difference in that the Pakistan Prime Minister took the initiative to explain to Premier Chou En-lai in Bandung in 1955 that Pakistan had not joined the military pacts or received the U.S. military aid with any aggressive designs against China. In an effort to pin him down, Premier Chou En-lai said in his speech to the political committee of the Afro-Asian conference in Bandung on 23 April 1955. He told “that although Pakistan was a party to a military treaty, Pakistan was not against China. The Prime Minister of Pakistan further assured that if the U.S. should take aggressive action under the military treaty or if the U.S. launched a global war, Pakistan would not be involved in it. I am grateful to him for this explanation, because though these explanations we achieve a mutual understanding.”

Eight years later, on 10 April 1963, in a statement to the Associated Press of Pakistan, Premier Chou En-lai said that the leaders of Pakistan had assured him in 1954 that Pakistan had joined the Western military alliances [CENTO and SEATO] only to gain political and military ascendancy over India and that “Pakistan had no other motivation in joining the pacts.” This revelation has not been denied by Pakistan authorities.

When Pakistan is going to fulfill its peace talk with India?

Mere talk of Pakistan and India won’t do the peace proposal.

Mere talk of Pakistan and India won’t do the peace proposal.

In Chennai, the anti-terror cell of the Tamil nadu police on Thursday [15-5-2008] claimed to have busted a sleeper cell of Islamic extremist after raiding a house in North Chennai.

In Jaipur Rajasthan serial blasts that killed 63 people on Tuesday [13-5-2008] could have been one of the most secretive and elaborate terror designs executed in recent years on Indian soil. Although police were woefully short on details even 24 hours after shock waves ripped through northern India’s biggest tourist hub, sleuths said they had zeroed in on the cycle shop which sold the bike on which an unexploded bomb was found.

The Jaipur Officials said investigators might ask the pujari of the Hanuman Mandir at Chandpole, from where the maximum casualties were reported, to identify suspects from among the 15 unidentified bodies.
Coming soon after the serial blasts in Faizabad, Lucknow and Varanasi and the attacks in Malegaon, where the explosives were strapped onto bicycles, jehadis had taken precautions not arouse suspicion by buying only one cycle from a shop. Police tracked down the shopkeeper from the frame number on the bike.
The Rajasthan police chief said investigators were trying to map the modus operandi of the terrorists, but initial facts suggested there might be a single mastermind who coordinated the operation but kept it secret from the foot soldiers who procured the cycles and planted them in busy places.

Though the DGP did not rule out the presence of SIMI cadres in the city, he said there was nothing concrete to point to their involvement or to link the attacks to the recent arrest of SIMI’s general secretary Safdar Nagori in Indore. Police were keeping a close watch on SIMI activities in the state.

Without stopping the terrorism of Pakistan activists in Jammu and Kashmir and in several places of India there is no use having peace talk with Pakistan Government. Mere talk won’t do the peace proposal.

U.S. Military aid to Pakistan.

U.S. Military aid to Pakistan.

In 1957 according to the President of Pakistan, the U.S. Military aid amounted to 40percent on the Pakistan Budget. He did not explain whether this was 40percent of the revenue Budget or of revenue and capital together. A year later when opposition parties began to criticize the government for being tied to the apron-strings of the U.S.A., James M.Langley then U.S. Ambassador in Pakistan, disclosed that the amount of economic aid to Pakistan was twice per capita compared to all the aids and loans given by the U.S. to India, that economic aid to Pakistan worked out to four times per capita the aid and loans the U.S. had given to India.

It is thus clear, whatever the Pakistan leaders might say, the quantum of the military aid which their country has received from the U.S.A. can only be described as massive in relation to Pakistan’s size and requirements. All this aid is outright gift.

The quantum of this aid is also indicated by the many directions in which Pakistan’s military strength has been developed. An extensive programmed of communications including roads, railways and a radar warning network was put through. Existing Air Ports and acrodromes like the one at Khartan, were built. The port of Ormara was developed. The U.S. set up its communication bases near Peshwar and in the northern territories of Kashmir under Pakistan’s unlawful occupation. The united state supplied Patton tanks, F-86 jet fighters, and subsequently F-104 fighter aircraft as well as air.to.air missiles and other sophisticated weapons.


From the United Kingdom, Pakistan received ships and naval equipment on loan. Five and a half divisions of its army were reorganized and equipped on the American system.l One of the problems on which CENTO powers concenterated was subversion and infiltration, and this would explain the massive scale on which Pakistan was able to organize and deploy infiltration across the cease-fire line into the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1965.


India fought a second war with Pakistan over Kashmir in 1965, little more than a year after Nehru's death. Pakistan's ruler at the time, Field Marshal Ayub Khan, personally planned Operation Grand Slam, which he hoped would totally cut Kashmir off at its narrow southern neck from India's Punjab.. But India's army was four times larger than Pakistan's, and quickly dispelled the popular Pakistani myth that one Muslim soldier was “worth ten Hindus.”


Operation Grand Slam ground to a halt as soon as India's tanks rolled west across the Punjab border to the environs of Lahore. In three weeks the second IndoPak War ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on U.S. ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the cease-fire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to Ayub's chagrin.


"The greater the ambition the greater the low."

Sixty three people were killed in Jaipur blasts. Muslims cannot solve any problem thro Sword and weapon.

Sixty three people were killed in Jaipur blasts. Muslims cannot solve any problem thro Sword and weapon.

Islam Teaches Muslims to be kind and Compassionate.

Mohammed the Prophet was born at Mecca in 570 A.D. in the respected House of Abdullah of the Hashmites, of the tribes of the qurasish. At the age of forty Mohammed began gaining a spiritual experience while visiting Mount Hills three miles from Mecca. .As a result of a whole month of rich spiritual experience, he was under believe that he has a mission to fulfil, namely to guide his countrymen and a mankind along a path leading to everlasting peace. A vision is said to have announced to him that he was the Prophet of Allah.Prophet Mohammed therefore, began to preach his doctrines of Allah or the one true God. God’s message thro Mohammed to mankind is incorporated in Holu “Koran”. His new faith was named as “Islam” literally meaning “Surrender”. Those who surrender to God are called Mussalmans or Muslims.

The teachings of Islam is as under:-

1. Oneness of God or strict monotheism “There is no god, but Allah, and Mohammed is his Prophet.

2. Prayers to God at least five times a day.

3. All mankind is a brotherhood.

4. The faithful must help their brethren according to their means, and charity must become a habit with a true Muslim.

5. Respect for women.6. Surrender of oneself to Allah.Islam also enjoins fasting in the month of Ramzon and vist to the places of faith viz., Mecca, Medina, etc., at least once in a life time.

Islam also calls upon the faithful not to drink wine, consume pork, gamble, steel, and slander others or commit murder. It expects all Muslims to be kind and compassionate to the poor, sick, the orphans and the widows.

In Rajasthan state, In Jaipur serial blasts that killed 63 people in cluding small children and pregnant ladies on Tuesday [13-5-2008] could have been one of the most secretive and elaborate terror designs executed in recent years on Indian soil. Although police were woefully short on details even 24 hours after shock waves ripped through northern India’s biggest tourist hub, sleuths said they had zeroed in on the cycle shop which sold the bike on which an unexploded bomb was found.

Based on the information gleaned from the shop owner, police released the sketch of a 25-year-old man with wheatish complexion, who spoke Hindi with a Bengali accent possibly pointing to a Bangladeshi connection. The man is believed to be stockily built and nearly 6 feet tall.

d. Coming soon after the serial blasts in Faizabad, Lucknow and Varanasi and the attacks in Malegaon, where the explosives were strapped onto bicycles, jehadis had taken precautions not arouse suspicion by buying only one cycle from a shop. Police tracked down the shopkeeper from the frame number on the bike.

Islam teaches mankind to all in the world. Particularly Muslim terrorists, if they want to follow the principals of the Islam, they must stop their killing activities in Jammu and Kashmir and also in other parts of the World.

True Muslim who follows the footstep of Allah must come forward to preach the teaching of Mankind thro love and affection and they cannot solve any problem thro sword or weapon.

The Soviet note of April 1958 complained of Pakistan

The Soviet note of April 1958 complained of Pakistan

When Pakistan accepted the U.S.military aid, Western policies were directed principally against communist countries. The view that Pakistan’s membership of Western military alliances and acceptance of the U.S.military aid were directed against communist powers is reinforced by the manner in which Pakistan supported Western polices in the United Nations and outside.

In the U.N. General Assembly and the Assembly’s first [Political] and special Political Committees, out of a total of 256 occasions when division was caused between 1952 and 1962, Pakistan voted with Western powers 165 times. A writer devoted to Pakistan’s cause, states that Pakistan had warmth of friendliness for Britain.” This leaning towards the West –going back to Jinnah’s time – was indeed reemphasized in 1950 when Liaquat Alikhan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan went to the extent of evading an invitation to visit Moscow. This policy continued during Khawja Nazimiddin’s Prime Ministership. Between 1954 and 1960, Pakistan followed a policy of “unqualified agreement” with the United States.
Which is borne by Pakistan’s voting record in the United Nations.

The Soviet Union and China reacted in these developments in varying degrees. In November 1953, Moscow sent a note of protest to Karachi, asking for clarification of Pakistan-America
Negotiations about military collaboration and American air bases in Pakistan. Another Soviet note to Karachi in March 1954 described the military aid agreement between Pakistan and the U.S. as an unfriendly act. When Pakistan and Turkey signed a military aid Agreement, the nucleus for the Baghdad Pact, the Soviet Union lodged another protest. “We do not like the Baghdad Pact at all,” said Khrushchev in Srinagar on 9 December 1955, “the most active participant of which is Pakistan.”


The Soviet note of April 1958 complained of Pakistan being a member of military-political alliance such as CENTO and SEATO, hostile to U.S.S.R.

Pakistan assumes India to be an enemy.

Pakistan assumes India to be an enemy.

The attempt of Pakistan during the past, to bring under umbrella of the two-nation theory all are most of the Muslim Countries to confront India with a united challenge to force it to its knee has proved to be flap. Pakistan assumes India to be an enemy. Indias enemy to be its friends, and Indias friends to be its enemies. This lends to the Pakistan foreign policy the character of a futile and negative expediency even in relations to Muslim Countries. The lack of genuine sympathy for Muslim countries was noted by an influential News paper of Cairo “Al Akbar,” when it is observed in 1962.


Following the downfall of the former Pakistan Government [1960] and formation of the new Government, we tried to forget the attitude of former Government and worked to improve our relations with the new Government. President Nasser then [1960] visited Pakistan and President Ayub Khan returned the visit [1961]. It was the during the visit of President Ayub Khan in Cairo that the Pakistan side refused to include in the joint statement any reference to the Pakistan support for the Palestinian case or the case of Algeria. The joint statement was then broadcast, without making any reference to those two important Arab causes.


The spirit of the foreign policy of Pakistan was not even ideological. It was purely anti-Indian. The reason why Ayub Khan had refused to support the Palestinian issue or the case of Algeria was Nasser’s refusal to agree to any mention of Kashmir in the joint communiqué. In no other case the exposure of Pakistan policy been so complete. Once the ideological skin was peeled off, as in the case, no ground was left for that policy to claim special consideration at the hands of other Muslim countries. Pakistan repudiated its own slogan of Islamic unity which its leaders had been shouting for over a decade in pursuit of anti-Indian objectives. This inner contradiction in their policy was to torrent them time and again in the years to come.


But actually India wants friendly co-operation with Pakistan and the present Prime Minister of India told http://www.indiaenews.com/politics/20080305/102183.htm “We want to live in peace, stability and prosperity with our neighbouring countries... We want mutually beneficial relations.
India and Pakistan should think about 'collective destiny, collective security and prosperity', Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Wednesday and termed as 'most courageous' the steps his predecessor Atal Bihari Vajpayee took to improve ties with Pakistan.”

Now it is up to Pakistan to join hands with India.

Hindu’s unanimous voice in Ram-Sethu get Victory.

Hindu’s unanimous voice in Ram-Sethu get Victory.

Supreme Court of India after a virtual religious discourse on the sacredness of Ram Sethu for two days and the apprehensions about a deep wound that would be inflicted on 100 crore Hindus if it was dredged, the Supreme Court on Thursday [8-5-2008] implored the government to explore the possibility of an in-depth study of the Sethu by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
This appeared to be in consonance with the demands of the petitioners who had said that the government was going ahead with the project without determining through an ASI study whether Ram Sethu — believed to be built by Lord Ram as a causeway to land in Lanka to rescue Sita from the clutches of demon Ravana — could classify as an ancient monument. A three-judge Bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices R V Raveendran, before adjourning hearing of the matter till July 22, asked the government to explore the possibility of an ASI study of Ram Sethu.



The petitioners, who have challenged the validity of the present alignment of the Sethusamudram Project that proposes dredging a channel having a width of 300 m on Rama Sethu to shorten the shipping distance between the western and eastern ports, have another reason to be happy. The court asked senior advocate Fali S Nariman to impress upon the Centre to examine the viability of an alternative alignment. This suggestion came from the Bench after Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy pointed out the fallacies in the decision of the Centre to go ahead with the project ostensibly under pressure from ally DMK. With the court restraining any dredging till further orders, this long adjournment along with the suggestions for an in-depth ASI study and consideration of an alternative alignment would be sure to delay the project, despite the government filing an application in the apex court seeking vacation of the interim stay order. Petitioners against project want ASI study to determine if Rama Sethu can be deemed an ancient monument


Court asks govt to consider ASI study and alternative alignment. Adjourns hearing to July 22.

Like worship place of Muslims Ka’ba, and Christians worship place of Bethlehem, Ram-Sethu is also a worship place of Hindus, which was built by the Hindu King Lord Rama . The Government of India should declare early that Ram-Sethu as an ancient monument of Hindus.

Put limits to your desire that will get you success

Put limits to your desire that will get you success

Men are driven by desires to achieve more of wealth possessions and reputation. They want to earn more and more money and high power in politics. . You perform action according to your desire. Your wrong desires may put you into trouble. How much of these will satisfy a person is anybody’s guess. Desire becomes an obsession with many people and they are always discontented, though they might have enough means for a normal living.

However there are people, who put limits to their desires. For them enough is enough and they apply their further energy in improving the quality of life. The scope for such quality oriented pursuits is limitless and keeps the mind in a happy, buoyant mood. Being satisfied with what they have, are free to pursue their constructive activities. They are enthusiastic in their actions without expectations of any material award. When the mind is thus abundantly provided from within every day, living is indeed a continual feast.

You don’t react, whether or not the results are according to your expectations, because those results are gift from the God. Try to control your desires by reading good books and hearing lectures from learned people. You must put your desires on learning and hard work only, because they will only give you wealth and satisfaction in life. Please put limits to your desire that will get you success.

Hasty climbers have sudden falls.

Our Homage to the three young staff of “Dinakaran”, who were killed by supporters of M.K.Azhagiri on 9-5-2007.

Our Homage to the three young staff of “Dinakaran”, who were killed by supporters of M.K.Azhagiri on 9-5-2007.

Three innocent young people killed in Madurai “Dinakaran” Tamil Daily News paper office on 9-5-2007, when protesters threw petrol bombs at the office building. We have already published the matter during 2007 in our blog with pictures.
This is due to supporters of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party in Tamil Nadu were protesting against the publication of an opinion poll that did not favor their leader MK Azhagiri, son of M.Karunanidhi, Tamilnadu Chief Minister.



The protestors set fire to the office of the Tamil daily Dinakaran in the temple town of Madurai, some 350 km south of Tamil Nadu state capital Chennai. In the fire accident, Two computer operators and a peon died of suffocation, The poll showed that only 2 percent of voters in Tamil Nadu wanted Azhagiri to succeed his father, state Chief Minister M Karunanidhi, as leader of the DMK party. Azhagiri is the Karunanidhi's eldest son. The poll indicated that 70 percent of voters wanted MK Stalin, Karunanidhi's younger son to succeed their father. Another 2 percent wanted Kanimozhi, Katrunanidhi's daughter to succeed him. The violence was due to a direct result of the succession struggle within the DMK party.




Tamil Nadu State Secretary Indian Communist [M&L] Thiru Pandian explained to ‘Junior Vikatan” reporter, “during the last one year the CBI has not taken any initiative in this case. The people who are all arrested are all came in bail.”


Political leaders are thinking our people are all idiots and doing whatever they want for aiming their power in Politics. At least, our people must now realize, and take a vow to get rid of them from politics. To the departed young staff of “Dinakaran” and to their families, we convey our condolence.

Pakistan must learn to live with neighbours and others in a spirit of understanding. [Bhutto.]

Pakistan must learn to live with neighbours and others in a spirit of understanding. [Bhutto.]

During 1965 Pakistan aggression first in Kutch and then to Kashmir were significant. Bhutto had talks with Premier Chou-En-lai on 2nd April in Karachi which he said were a follow up of the talks he had with Chen Yi in March. Cho-En_lai again stopped over in Karachi for two hours on 9 june 1965. By this time preparations were fully under way for aggression on a much more ambitious scale in Kashmir, a warning of which was by no less a person than President Ayub khan himself. Addressing a meeting of the Pakistan Muslim league Council in Islamabad in July 1965, President Ayub Khan asked the nation “to become prepared to face the critical situation ahead and render all sacrifices for national honour”. He alleged that India believed in military solutions of various Indo-Pakistan disputes and said “Pakistan will be facing a difficult situation and the nation should be fully prepared to face it.

This was three weeks before Pakistan attempted to seize Kashmir by massive armed infiltration, and about seven weeks before its enormous military machine, built up by the U.S.A. was set in motion against India. Pakistan’s two aggressions in 1965 had China’s fullest support. In the second case China lent active help on the ground to Pakistan by issuing a ultimatum to India, thereby effectively tying down the latter’s forces in the eastern sector Of the Himalayas.
Pakistan’s Military equipment with Chinese markings was found with Pakistan Army personnel captured are killed in Kashmir. The presence of Pakistan Military mission in Peking during the conflict is not without significance.

The Chinese ultimatum ensured that Indian troops could not be moved from North East Frontier Agency to the Punjab front, where, despite Rawal pindi’s optimistic communiqués , Pakistan military position deteriorating rapidly. As the New York Times put it, Pakistan’s “only real object in fighting was to reopen the fundamental discussion of the Kashmir problem and this has not so far been attained. She has failed to inflict even a local defeat on the Indian Army and her losses to tanks and aircraft were no doubt the real reason why she has obeyed the UN Resolution. The image of Pakistan as a powerful military nation, equipped with efficient arms by its western allies, was shattered.

The foreign Minister of Pakistan, Bhutto found a essential in the existing condition of the world that “We must learn to live with neighbours and others” in a spirit of understanding. This the present Pakistan Government should follow.

Indian Government should not stand as a guide for the unlawful action of dredging Ram-Sethu.

Indian Government should not stand as a guide for the unlawful action of dredging Ram-Sethu.

In our Indian tradition, all the Four Vedas are beginningless and the origin of them is totally forgotten. In Hindu Desam it is believed that the Vedas were arranged by Veda Vyasa, who lived in the closing years of the Divapara Yuga, come to an end on the 18th februar 3012 B.C. In the beginning of the Kaliyuga, the Vedas and other allied literature must have been composed long before 3102 B.C. Further taking into consideration, the dynasty of the Kings mentioned in the puranas, the date of the Rig Vedic civilization goes back to 3000B.C.
The Rig-Veda contains some hymns which reveal a trend towards the belief of one God. For example in Rig-Veda, the mystery of the universe and the philosophy concept pf Brahman are expressed in such verses:-

“Who is our father, our creator, maker,
Who every place doth know and every creature,
By whom alone to gods their names were given,
To him all other creatures go,to ask him.”


The epics of that period Ramayana and Mahabharata have all there characteristic and present a picture of society of that period. The Ramayana describing the life story of Rama son of King Dasaratha of Ayodhya. These stories describe the actual happenings of those days.
Worshipping Ram-Sethu is a faith of Hindu’s.
Some people asking, whether Ram-Sethu is a place of worship? There is no doubt in this. Rameswaram and the temple deity Lord Ramanatha swami exist for the last thousands of years. Rama worshipped Siva at Rameswaram Temple is a known fact from the ancient Purana’s. The Ramanatha Swamy Temple is still standing as Historical evidence. We must have belief in everything.


The Tamil Nadu Government is purposely hiding the facts of available records about Ramar-Sethu Bridge. About the existence of the Bridge, Ram-Sethu Bridge protection committee has now brought it to the notice of all people.
In the Department of land-survey records of Ramanathapuram district, in the Survey record books, it is shown in page 287, that 12 Acres and 91 Ars were the upland boundaries of Ram-Sethu island. Like this several other authentic information were also told by the elderly people of Ramanathapuram

Ramar Padam.

Point Calimere Wildlife and Bird Sanctuary.
In Tamilnadu Government forest Department Portal, information about Ramar Padam has been explained.See in http://www.forests.tn.nic.in/WildBiodiversity/ws_pcws.html
At Pointcalimere Ramar Padam (literally Ramar Footprint) located on the highest point of land in the sanctuary, is a small shrine containing the stone footprints of Lord Rama. Large numbers of Ramar devotees gather here during the 2nd week of April to celebrate Ram Navami Festival.
Suppressing the facts of Ram-Sethu, the atheist Tamil Nadu Government Chief Minister will not attain any eternal bliss and he will always have the curse of one particular religion people from the whole world. Let Ram pardon them


Bethlehem is the Worship Place of Christians.

Bethlehem is the birthplace of Jesus and therefore a holy site to

Christians around the world. Christians are having faith on the birth place of Christ and they are going there and doing their worship.

The entrance to the church is a low doorway that has its own legends. One story is that the door was installed by the Muslims during their rule to remind Christians that they were guests in the country and must bow to their hosts. An alternative explanation is that the height of the door was designed to prevent unbelievers from entering the church on horseback. Yet another version holds that it was to protect the Christians from their hostile neighbors


Ka’ba worship Place of Muslims.




According to Islamic belief, God ordained a place of worship on Earth to reflect a house in heaven. Muslims believe that Adam, the first man, was the first to build such a place of worship. According to the Qur'an, the Ka'ba that stands today was built by the prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) and his son Ismail (Ishmael).
According to archaeologists, the Ka'ba certainly predates Islam. It was rebuilt several times by the tribes ruling Mecca, who used it to house sacred objects, including the Black Stone, and as a shrine to Arabian tribal gods.


Every person must have true faith and earnest longing on their religion and God., From the Purana’s it was told that under the leadership of Lord Rama and with the help Vanara sena and Nala Ram-Sethu was constructed. We need not go the question of whether Ramar-Sethu really exists. What could be the big land mass bridging India and Sri-Lanka? Is it a geological formation? If not, who could make a massive earth or bridge on the sea, addressed “Adam’s Bridge’ by the British Rulers? Harming the Sethu would amount to the violation of the belief of the Hindus and consequently breach of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 25 of the Indian constitution.
Dams can be built on Ganga, But destroying another monument or worship place standing on riverbed side like “Tajmahal” should not be destroyed.

Ram-Sethu is a monument built by the Hindu King, Hence it should not be destroyed. By allowing dredging of Ram-Sethu, millions of Hindus faith will be buried and the Government should not stand as a guide for this unlawful action.